Tito is the second installment in the new-wave Egyptian action movies. After Mafia by Sherif Arafa, which was a breakthrough in Egyptian cinema making, Tarek El-Aryan brings us Tito, the next logical step. Very simply, this movie is about an ex-con who tries to escape his sinful life by starting a new one, but his past comes back to haunt him. The reason, why Tito is better than Mafia is because the script and story line in Tito is more complex, and some of the characters had real depth in them and where fully developed throughout the movie.
Acting
El Sakka's physicality makes Tito terrifying yet broken.
Writing
Fares and Refaat: villains with actual psychology, shockingly rare.
Direction
El-Aryan stages Cairo as a character suffocating its people.
Director
Tarek Al-Aryan
Trivia, insights & behind the scenes
This cemented Ahmed El Sakka as Egypt's action king, spawning a decade of imitators with less soul.
Part of a brief golden age when Egyptian cinema dared to show police as corrupt and criminals as sympathetic—political bravery disguised as entertainment.
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion — comments are spoiler-gated to your watch progress.
Discussion starters
EG
